It does make sense but I think it might be too much for the movie considering Mr Terrific, Hawkgirl, Guy Gardner and Metamorpho are also in the movie. I have to be honest, never in my life did I ever expect to see Metamorpho in a Superman movie or any movie for that matter, nor did I expect to ever see Superman fight a gigantic fire breathing dinosaur/lizard (or whatever it is) either in a movie. Having said that I guess anything is possible.

There's no such thing as a weak Superman (putting the Kryptonite factor aside) what makes a Superman a Superman? The fact that he gets his butt kicked gets a few cuts and bruises, stops to catch his breath from time to time, gets knocked out cold for a few minutes, but he always gets back up, that's a Superman.

Without sounding like a "nark", people really need to stop comparing Richard Donner's Superman to Zack Snyder's Superman and how James Gunn is going to fix mistakes with his take on Superman. Superman 1 & 2 were made for the era they were made in (and very sugar coated for a PG rating to get backsides in cinema seats.) Zack Snyders Superman is a Superman for the 21st century, world affairs are entirely different and somewhat more violent with technical advances, weaponry. If anything I find Snyders Superman to be more realistic than Donner's Superman. Warners were hoping for a Superman saving cats from trees who pats kids on the heads making some cheesy statement before flying off into the sunset, also WB don't even fully understand Superman as a "Product" and really didn't know how to promote MOS & BVS properly and took the easy way out blaming Snyder for the movies shortfalls and constantly delaying a MOS sequel thus not giving Superman a chance to grow. I just hope that Gunns take on Superman isn't a Marvel movie with DC characters BUT I'm holding on to my optimisim that Gunn won't be that blatently obvious with his Superman.